![]() I haven’t seen the responses that say that. There may be an "easy" way around it by a separate (subdirectory) Board install for a v1 subforum, not sure. I tried launching a script from Explorer, and got the dialogue:īut is it possible, and in terms of work feasible, to keep v1 syntax highlighting in existing v1 forum posts? And for new v1 code in the v1 subforums?Įxcellent suggestion, by the responses, it sounds as if the forum S/W caters for one style only, unconditional on topic. I began trying to run scripts from SciTE, which presumably doesn't check the Launcher auto-detect routines, it just tries to error-check according to the platform selected.Īnyway, fixed now. So I renamed the Autohokey folder, "AutohotkeyV1", then continued with the default installation of v2. So when I installed v2, at the prompt for the path, I wasn't sure what to do to leave the option of going back to v1 or running both. ![]() It was also confusing because (note to devs.) the v2 installer didn't say anything about installing alongside v1 (or I missed it - I don't know if it would, in fact). I read that the Launcher would automatically detect the version from the file contents and settings, but that still obviously leaves two incompatible interpreters, and it can only make a binary decision. Thanks, boiler, it's kind of obvious now. ![]() So you’re right that a script needs to be able to fully stand on its own as either v1 or v2 code. ![]() Yes, that would cause problems as neither the v1 nor the v2 interpreter can run hybrid code. will neither version be able to run this hybrid code? Presumably, that's the case, and v1 scripts have to be developed in v1 or fully converted to run in v2.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |